Lockyer champions a fresh field

April 6th, 2012

The Australian April 05, 201212:00AM

DARREN Lockyer has always been more than a rugged face and a husky voice, and in his retirement from professional football the former Brisbane Broncos, Queensland Maroons and Kangaroos captain is the champion of a new field.

Lockyer has been appointed an ambassador for Queensland architecture, working with promotional program HEAT, a Queensland government initiative. “I’ve seen a lot of architecture around the world and as other countries speak different languages so, too, there are different architectural languages. I want to introduce people to the style of architecture we have in Queensland.”

Lockyer, who was born in Roma in the state’s southwest, reveals how his interest in architecture began when, in the late 1990s, he drove by a house in the Brisbane suburb of Bardon designed by local architect Shane Thompson and thought: “That house is just so fantastic, I love it.”

Now 34, married to Loren Pollock and with two children — Flynn and Sunny — he is building his first family home and has commissioned young Brisbane-based design firm Owen and Vokes.

“It’s at the conceptual stage,” he said. “At one of the first meetings with Paul (Owen) I walked out thinking that things would go really well because instead of Paul asking us what sort of house we wanted, or what it should look like, he asked: ‘How do you live, can you tell me the way you guys live, and we’ll design the space and structure around that feedback.’

“With two kids, and in time more kids coming, it’s important that everything is on one level and the kids can go out on to a grassed area. We didn’t tell him how many rooms we wanted or that kind of thing, it was that we wanted the children to be able to play, but in the afternoon we wanted to be able to invite friends over and have a glass of wine — and we wanted to be able to entertain, but not have the kids under our feet.

“The good thing about a house that is architecturally designed is that you never get bored with it. You come home every day and you just really love the space you live in (and) it makes you happy, and life is too short not to be happy.

“If you spend a lot of time at home, particularly when you are raising a family, being in an environment that you are really happy to be in makes you really productive in every other area of your life.”

Directions in QLD architecture , , , , ,

The Crossroad Idea

April 3rd, 2012

For decades, the ‘Project Home’ has essentially remained the dominant model of housing for the Australian population. Ninety-seven percent of all houses built in our nation are hammered up by companies who base floor plans, construction methods and finishes on price points and profit margins rather than a response to environment and and to maximised liveability for their clients.

Therefore, as one drives along a typical subdivision street, there is little to distinguish one house from another. Monotony and plainness rule the exteriors bar a few tacked on superficial bits I call ‘architectural fluff’ i.e. fake stone or historically inspired hebel mouldings. Individuality, lifestyle and comfortable indoor-outdoor living are all unwitting casualties of this mindless market dominated dreariness.

But what are the options? It seems as if for most people it’s a project house or no house at all. Statistically, architecturally driven solutions start at around $2500 per square metre. That fact alone voids the argument for most people between ‘custom’ versus ‘standard’. The majority of people simply can’t afford one-off designs, which is precisely why only 3% of homes built are designed to benefit the lifestyle and comfort of the client.

The solution to this quandary is not only found in better and more appropriate house designs, but is also in challenging public conservatism. However, the fear of stepping out, of trying something new even if it has been determined to be a significant improvement, makes change slow.

In past blog posts you may have read my excitement surrounding a prefabrication system utilising insulated panel. The system is known as Insuwall and is fabricated by a company called Bondor. The year 2012 has seen this product commercialised with the first display house finished late 2011. In my search for a system that has the qualities needed to produce comfortable living in our subtropical environment, Bondor’s Insuwall is the best I have found so far both from a cost-per-square-metre and in its aesthetic links with products the public are
already familiar with (For more info, please see www.insulliving.com.au ).

Our design (shown above) is built entirely out of Insuwall panel. It uses a 140mm exterior wall, 90mm interior walls and 150mm Solar Span as roofing material. The composite panel achieves amazing R-Values (thermal ratings) and in most circumstances easily obtains a 7-8 Green Star Rating. It is also listed as a ‘zero’ carbon product. The process of production sees panels extruded off the factory floor in 1200mm wide sections that can be easily modified to allow for a significantly quicker and cheaper build when compared to traditional brick veneer construction.

This is a new system that begs considered application. If the general public can move past conservatism and recognise the value in a fresh approach, much good will be done for Australian living standards. Systems, however, are only as good as their application. You can have a great product, but poor use of it does no one any good. If Insuwall was used just as an alternative wall and roofing system, with no thought to house orientation or change in floor-plan arrangements, we would only be marginally better off. Systems must be combined with intelligent and creative use to achieve the change that is desperately needed in the ‘average’ subdivision.

Consider the following concept that, while it sits within the project home demographic, offers a complete departure from traditional models of living. It presents an idea of how static space might be rejuvenated through unique interactions with environment.

I have coined the concept; ‘The Crossroad’. It draws influence from a reality that we engage with daily; the bitumen crossing. This man-made environment is a space controlled by stop lights; it is a space that forces us to interact with other cars and facilitates the manoeuvring of ours in the midst of theirs. The placing of a crossroad into the centre of a home means that the occupants are provided with a place where communication and interaction is facilitated and experienced. It’s the hub around which the household revolves. It’s a place that anticipates memories.

This intersection also allows for four distinctive sight lines to be maintained. While one is standing at the centre of the crossing, there is offered four varied and unique perspectives to environments beyond. As the seasons progress and change, so do the experiences of vegetation, light and breeze through these four different outlooks, making this a dynamic and interactive space.

Unlike its aesthetically harsh bitumen counterpart, our point of intersection is met with the beauty of a landscaped outdoor courtyard. This centrepiece floods the four directions with natural light and provides a direct engagement with greenery. The courtyard is an occupiable environment surrounded by glass sliding doors and louvers. When opened, cross ventilation is maximised allowing for the extremities to become breeze ways.

This concept, though still rectangular in outward form, offers a new direction, steering away from the same-ness offered up in a traditional project home layout. To have a landscaping component that literally becomes the centre point of the home means there will always be an engagement with landscape that is both direct and private. It is an opportunity to personalise the interior of the home in deeper ways other than the cosmetic applications of soft furnishings, bench and tile colours.

I once heard the famous Melbourne architect Sean Godsell say, “We need to design with a level of compassion in mind; architecture is about creating the incidental moment through internal spatial configuration and its relationship to environment.” It might be an afternoon shaft of light, a gentle breeze that washes past while in the private courtyard, or the way shadows fall reflecting the beauty of the landscape. All these natural elements contribute to a sense of peace and serenity even while living in the midst of a suburban 450-600m2 subdivision. To be rewarded with these experiences daily no matter the economic demographic is what architecture should be about. It should be something everyone can experience not just the ‘top 3%’.

Bleuscape Design Projects, Project Home Debate , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WHAT is beauty?

March 29th, 2012

WORDS BY TIMOTHY HILL, DONOVAN HILL ARCHITECTS

As an architect, I have professional obligations regarding beauty, so I need a robust definition. Contemporary society is largely unaware of how little influence architects have in making and maintaining the built environment. For beauty to be championed, a good definition becomes vital.
So if it is important, how is “place beauty” defined? As part of being professional, I defer to one of the gentler masters, Finnish architect Alvar Aalto. His output works with what he called “Life Enhancing Charm”, “LEC”, as we say around the office. He authored places where “the look” took a supporting role to the lead pleasure giver, the LEC. Hand rails are comfortable to hold, there is a sense of being outside even when deeply inside and it is easy to find one’s way around (just follow the light).
I tried to work with this definition of beauty at the State Library of Queensland project, in areas where I could be influential. The light in the central “Knowledge Walk” is bright enough to be suggestive of outdoor space, but without harsh shadows, harsh glare, or harmful UV rays. In this way, people can see each other fully (instead of appearing as silhouettes) and books and laptops can be comfortably enjoyed “outside”.
Is it odd for an architect to rely on knowledge about beauty rather than a feeling for it? I think beauty is in the feelings of the beholder.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/eye-of-the-beholder/story-fn6ck8la-1226308930604

 

Famous Architects , , ,

A labour of LOVE

March 9th, 2012

It hardly seems appropriate to be showing some of my own work after posting a blog on Louis Kahn, however I do want to let you in on what we have been up to and share the story behind the ‘Valentine House’.

As many of you may know Jaki, the kids and I live in Cornubia, Queensland. It is a leafy suburb about twenty minutes south of Brisbane. We have lived here for almost 7 years now and really enjoy it. The place is beautiful with walking trails that wind through the bush eventually looping back close to where we live. On our walks, both Jaki and I have noted and admired an incredible block of land that is at the halfway mark. Currently unoccupied, except for a family of wallabies, the land is dotted with Ghost Gum and Eucalyptus trees. The way the light falls on the block in the morning and afternoon is really amazing. We think it’s really special.

Every architect and designer at some point in life has visions of creating their own home. For me it is no different, actually having embarked on the process several times. While this exercise still remains a design dream due to monetary constraints (and one of us having fairly expensive taste) it is never-the-less a fun thing to do.

This year for Valentine Day I decided to do something different. I wanted to design Jaki her dream home on this block that we always pass on our walks. With pen and paper in hand one evening, a few days before THE day, I sat her down and we devised a brief. It was as follows:

Design Brief

  • Pavilion living separating the public and private
  • Glass walkways to link pavilions
  • Double carport
  • Open plan Kitchen / Dining / Living (fire place to living)
    • Emphasis on natural light, and breeze
  • Kitchen to open up to both courtyard and lawn
  • The public space to have guided perspectives to the landscape
  • A large double height courtyard / outdoor room (outdoor fireplace)
  • 2 room Master Bed with linking ENS
  • 2 extra bedrooms for the kids
  • A bathroom with separate WC
  • Study nook near kids rooms
  • Guest Bed and ENS with attached study at the other end of the house
  • Decent sized storage
  • Descent sized laundry
  • 12m lap pool and deck (framless glass balustrade)

Quite a brief! So that night I set to work. The following images hopefully depict my ideas and the presentation I gave to her on Valentines Day. Enjoy!

(For a more detailed description of the layout please see the main website www.bleuscape.com.au under Custom Architecture / Current).

Bleuscape Design Projects , , , , , ,

Kahn’s Franklin D. Roosevelt Monument

March 6th, 2012

Below is an amazing article on the soon to be realised Franklin D. Roosevelt Monument designed by Louis Kahn 38 years after he died. This memorial will be just one of only a handful of Kahn creations in this world and New York’s first. Paul Goldberger, former architecture critic and editor of the New Yorker describes Kahn as being like a baseball player that rarely goes up to bat but when he does he hits a home run almost all the time. Like a deceased artist of repute whose works tends to increase in value once they have left this mortal earth, this project for New York will be a landmark, an architectural gift to the city from one of the worlds long gone masters, it is sure not to disappoint.

SUE ANN KAHN vividly remembers hearing the news of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s death in 1945, while eating dinner at her grandmother’s house. Her father, the architect Louis I. Kahn, had turned on the radio in the dining room, an unprecedented breach of decorum. The whole family stood up to observe a moment of silence. “I didn’t understand what it was all about,” said Ms. Kahn, only a child at the time. “But I knew something momentous had just happened.”

Years later, in 1972, Louis Kahn, widely recognized as one of America’s most original modern architects, set to work creating a monument dedicated to Roosevelt for New York City. Designed to adorn the southernmost tip of Roosevelt Island, the memorial – a double row of trees narrowing to a single stone room open to sky and sea – framed views of the harbor and skyline with the simple but stirring monumentality of a Greek temple.

Although Kahn completed the design, and a local architect prepared the documents needed for construction, the memorial was never built, the victim of a city fiscal crisis. The Franklin D. Roosevelt Monument turned out to be one of the last projects completed by Kahn, who died while traveling in 1974. His body was found unattended in the men’s room at Pennsylvania Station. A notebook with sketches and jottings about the memorial was found with his belongings.

Now the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation, the state-appointed organization that runs the island, has commissioned a new design by a New York landscape designer for the 14-acre site, known as Southpoint Park. Taking into account feedback from residents and visitors, the design would substitute the granite memorial and overarching linden trees of Kahn’s plan with a lawn for 7,000 spectators to view performances on a removable stage. There would also be a sledding hill and a skate pond.

Devotees of Roosevelt and of Kahn are hoping that it is not too late to reconsider Kahn’s 2.8-acre memorial as part of the 14-acre site. With renewed interest in the art of memorial-making (because of plans for ground zero) and in the work of Kahn (because of a film made last year by his son, Nathaniel), the time is finally ripe, they say, to realize Kahn’s plan.

Peter Reed, a curator at the Museum of Modern Art who worked on the 1992 Kahn show at the museum, described the memorial project as “a great opportunity for New York City to get a building by Kahn.”

“It addresses in architecture,” he said, “the same spirit of optimism that Roosevelt expressed in his leadership.”

Beginning Monday, a show at Cooper Union will allow a larger audience to see for the first time much of the project’s original documentation, including Kahn’s drawings, the first presentation model, the sketchbook found at his death and construction documents made on waxed linen by his associate architects, Mitchell/Giurgola of New York. At a symposium on Jan. 25, historians and architects will consider the project and changing ideas of monumentality.

“Of all the unbuilt projects, this is the one that really could be done, and now, more than ever, should be done,” said Nathaniel Kahn, whose film “My Architect,” tracking the indelible imprint left by his brilliant but emotionally opaque father on family, colleagues and the world, was nominated for an Academy Award last year. “Surely that incredible site cannot be given over to just another public space. It has to be something really special. New York City needs a great monument to Roosevelt.”

But those opposed to the memorial say supporters waited too long. “Kahn’s memorial was played out in a different time, a different era, a different world,” said Herbert Berman, president of the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation. “It was right for 30 years ago, not for now.” Today, he said, those who live on Roosevelt Island are interested in less formal uses for the land.

In a survey, residents complained that the memorial would cost too much, that the trees in the Kahn proposal would block their front-row view of Fourth of July fireworks and that the granite structure was too severe.

Further interviews revealed that residents enjoyed the disrepair that characterized the site, especially the ruins of a smallpox hospital built in the 1850′s when the island was used to quarantine the sick. But locals said they also wanted the park to be a place for contemplation, not just for sporty recreation. More than a fifth of the island’s 9,500 residents are handicapped (patients, outpatients and former patients from the Coler-Goldwater Specialty Hospital). There are many playing fields for children elsewhere on the island.

Last April, the operating corporation invited the Trust for Public Land, a national nonprofit organization that helps communities protect and conserve land by developing parks and recreational activities, to come up with new proposals for attracting people to the park and to the island.

In November the trust presented the operating corporation with “Wild Gardens/Green Rooms,” a picturesque park designed by Mark K. Morrison, a local landscape designer who is currently working on security fencing for the United Nations, as well as on numerous Manhattan playgrounds. The design includes a cafe in the ruins of the smallpox hospital and an earth mound providing enough contour for sledding in winter. The removable stage at the edge of a large lawn would be located at the southernmost tip, where Kahn put his granite room open to the sea.

The 14-acre “Wild Gardens” would cost approximately $34 million to complete, with a first phase planned at $10 million needed to stabilize the collapsing hospital ruins and clear pathways on the west side to the now inaccessible point. That’s $4 million more than Kahn’s 2.8-acre memorial design would cost, according to a revised budget prepared in 2003 for the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute by the Plaza Construction Corporation.

In February the Trust for Public land will present “Wild Gardens” to the board of directors at the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation for final approval; the board will then seek the necessary financing from public and private sources.

“Louis Kahn would have done it differently if he were alive today,” said Charles McKinney, the consultant in charge of the Roosevelt Island park proposal for the Trust for Public Land. “He was well known for his concerns about creating communal spaces, and he would have understood the importance of this community’s concerns, and he would have responded.”

“Hundreds of thousands of people see the island from their apartment windows or their cars and are intrigued,” he continued. “Some take trams out to see it, but when they get there, nothing happens. There needs to be something for them to look at and to do.”

Certainly, the mandate was different 30 years ago. Kahn’s commission was part of an ambitious island redevelopment plan begun by the New York State Urban Development Corporation. The island, then known as Welfare Island, It had been not only a quarantine spot, but also a prison, a lunatic asylum and a quarry.

The plan, announced by Mayor John V. Lindsay in September 1973, was to turn the island into a varied-income urban utopia (along the lines of the planned community in Reston, Va.), with the Roosevelt memorial, the only one in New York City, as its centerpiece and chief attraction.

Kahn was inspired by Roosevelt’s famous “Four Freedoms” speech (about freedom from want, freedom to worship, freedom from fear and freedom of speech) delivered to Congress on Jan. 6, 1941, at one of the darkest hours of the war, after France had fallen, but before Pearl Harbor. As he developed his design, Kahn, an émigré from Estonia, was keenly aware of the United Nations’ presence right across the river.

“Roosevelt said he didn’t want any memorial, only a plaque in front of the National Archives” in Washington, said William vanden Heuvel, a chairman of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute. “But the ‘Four Freedoms’ speech was very much part of how he thought of the world he wanted to see.” With the announcement of the plan, the island was renamed Roosevelt Island.

Kahn worked on the design for about a year, said Harriet Pattison, a landscape designer (and Nathaniel Kahn’s mother) who worked with Louis Kahn on the project. All Kahn’s revisions, she added, were aimed at making the design simpler and more timeless.

The site was to be on an elevated platform of land – arduous earth-moving work was done in the mid-1990′s in anticipation of the Kahn plan’s being realized – so that a grand staircase could be positioned as a threshold. (At that time, Mitchell/Guirgola also added ramps for handicap access.) From the top of the stairs, a wide lawn would line both sides with rows of linden trees, narrowed to the point. There, looking out to sea, a square room would be built of monumental granite blocks standing side by side, with a one-inch gap allowing sun to filter through. Two parallel walls were to stand 12 feet high, but there would be no roof. On one wall, the “Four Freedoms” speech would be inscribed. There was also talk of a statue and a bust of Roosevelt. On the side facing south toward the harbor, the room was to be left open, with a low wall for sitting. At high tide, water would rise up stone banks, and the room would appear from a distance to be almost floating.

“Kahn made monuments that address nature like the ancients did, with a sense of the infinite,” said Michael Lewis, a professor of art at Williams College who has written the introduction for the Cooper Union exhibition catalog, noting that monumentality was a subject always on this architect’s mind. (Kahn designed several memorials, including the Memorial to Six Million Jewish Martyrs in Battery Park.) None were built. “But this was the most important of all his monuments, summing up 50 years of his thinking about it,” Mr. Lewis said. “It was the ripest of all his monuments and it would be a coup for New York City to have it.”

In addition to the drawings from the Kahn archive in Philadelphia, which are rarely shown in public, the exhibition at Cooper Union will include a digital projection showing Kahn’s memorial as it would look on Roosevelt Island, against a backdrop of New York City as it would appear in 2007, complete with the new Queens West housing development just across the river.

Mr. Berman at the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation said that the next step was to try to secure state financing to go forward with the “Wild Gardens” proposal, while supporters of Kahn’s Roosevelt Memorial said that theyd hope the exhibition would attract enough attention to revive serious interest in building Kahn’s plan.

Kahn would probably have been philosophical about the new twist of fate for his last monument design. At a lecture last year about his unbuilt works, Ms. Pattison read a statement by Kahn.

“That which is not built is not really lost,” he wrote. “Once its value is established, its demand for presence is undeniable. It is merely waiting for the right circumstances.”

Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

Famous Architects , , , , ,

Life Architecturally – Robert McBride & Debbie Ryan

March 5th, 2012

Last week I had the privilege of listen to a recent documentary on the work of well-known Melbourne based architectural firm ‘McBride Charles Ryan’. The short film was called ‘Life Architecturally’ and was aired on ABC’s Artscape.

McBride Charles Ryan are one of the most progressive architectural firms in our country, they seem to approach their work with an almost comical, childlike manner but at the same time delivering to their clients tight and comprehensive projects. I wanted to share the link on my blog as it is a reminder of why we do what we do. They are an uncompromising and inspirational breath of fresh air in our industry.

http://www.abc.net.au/arts/stories/s3441644.htm

Famous Architects , , , , , , ,

Quote of the day

March 4th, 2012

One of the exciting things about architecture is that it gives you so many reasons to be modest.

- Rem Koolhaas

Amazing Quotes , , , , , , , ,

Quote of the day

December 31st, 2011

I see simplicity not so much as a disregard for complexity but as a clarification of the significant.

- Glenn Murcutt

Amazing Quotes , , , ,

Queenslanders shift to smaller homes

December 6th, 2011

MORE Queenslanders are downsizing to medium-density homes, new research shows.

Figures from recent Census data and research by Bankwest found 38 per cent of home approvals in Queensland in the last 12 months were for medium-density dwellings.

This is up from 32 per cent in 2006 and includes units, townhouses and semi-detached houses.

Bankwest Retail chief executive Vittoria Shortt said Queenslanders were moving to a different style of living. “It’s primarily due to affordability, access to services and a tight rental market,” she said.

“In Queensland the move to medium-density dwellings is right across Queensland and you see a lot more areas becoming medium-density.”

Redcliffe saw the biggest increase in the share of medium-density dwellings in the state at 62 per cent, up from 25 per cent in 2006.

Ms Shortt said the change came from first-home buyers moving into the market and baby boomers downsizing.

“Gen Y are really struggling to achieve their aspiration of home ownership and it goes to the affordability and ability to save for the deposit,” she said.

“Part of it is a downsizing for some of the baby boomers and a reflection of where their superannuation is or isn’t at.

“I think the affordability goes across a lot of the generations and we are really seeing it play out.”

Thirty-one of the 35 local areas in Queensland had an increase in the share of medium-density housing in the past five years.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/life/homesproperty/shift-to-smaller-homes/story-e6frequ6-1226214640369?sv=f48193067be35f5b2a957257582fea52

Project Home Debate , , , , , , ,

‘Grand Designs’ – An Insight Into How The Europeans Build

November 11th, 2011

For anyone with an interest in design and building, Kevin McCloud’s latest series of ‘Grand Designs’ being shown on the ABC at 7:30pm on Sundays provides an insight into the world of better built and high thermal performance housing.

While more extreme temperatures have driven the refinement of building systems in Europe and the US, the carbon pollution implications of pumping brown-coal based electricity into poorly insulated houses in Victoria has made it an agenda very relevant to Australia.

We have introduced minimum insulation standards and now model the thermal performance of building fabrics (outer shell). We started at 5 Star regulatory minimums, have just gone to 6 Star, and ultimately should be heading for 7.5 Stars minimum for most Australian climate bands.

Grand Designs gives a wonderful illustration of how the Europeans insulate their buildings and the sort of construction required to create better insulated and sealed buildings. In the projects covered to date, there is yet to be a wall framed with timber less than 150mm wide, mainly because wider walls are required to fit in insulation if you are aiming to effectively insulate to levels above R2-R2.5. You get the distinct feeling that a length of 90 x 45 pine framing would be considered a minor bracing timber rather than suitable for stud walls.

To place how the English are approaching their housing into context, David Cameron’s conservative UK Government has legislated that by 2016 all new homes built in the United Kingdom will be zero emission on heating and cooling. The UK Governments’ ‘Code for Sustainable Homes’ legislates binding regulations for energy reduction with staggered targets: 25 percent more efficient by 2010, 44 per cent by 2013, and 100 per cent, or zero emissions by 2016.

Now passed into law, the code sets minimum standards for both energy and water efficiency. In addition, the UK government has agreed that any home achieving Level 6 sustainability rating will be exempt from stamp duty. It has been calculated that by 2050 70% of UK homes will be zero carbon in operation.

Yes, that is 2016 – 5 years away and not a long-term 2050 possible target. And many Australians think the rest of the world is not taking action on climate change?

Text Provided by http://www.habitechsystems.com.au/news/

Sustainability , , , , , , , , ,